Thursday, November 25, 2010

The Disney Derring-Do: Fantasia

Animation at Its Best



If you thought that Walt was pushing the envelope with the previous 2 films, you ain't seen nothing yet. Starting as a spectacular short to boost the flagging appeal of Mickey Mouse, the project soon became too expensive to justify as anything but a feature, so the theme was expanded upon with additional forays into the world of sight and sounds it its purest forms. Fantasia was perhaps Walt's most perfect realization of animation as an art form, not only in expressing as-yet unmatched beauty on film, but marrying it with another, more accepted and established form of art- classical music. In a way, this was simply an extension of the previously popular musical shorts and a precursor to the package films of the later 40s, but altogether, Fantasia is way beyond that level. The staggering quality and effort put into making this an altogether unique experience- culminating in the doomed Fantasound experiment is so impressive it makes me weep to find it so underappreciated. For yes, in 1940, Fantasia was released to lukewarm audiences and financial disaster- sending the studio reeling to the edge of bankruptcy and officially obliterating any gains from the only big success to date. At the time, Disney was just another one-hit wonder.

Of course the only thing I have to wonder about is why people could be so indifferent to this film. Classical music has an air of snobbery and pretension to it- more due to the people who listen to it than the music itself. There are few styles that can translate more universally than classical- whether it be relaxing, invigorating or frightening. Even in contemporary music, you can find references and inspirations drawn from classical compositions. But, on to the movie! Fantasia is one of my earliest memories- and I believe it is because Walt hit upon a basic truth- you don't even need to have a grasp of the English language- or any language whatsoever to be moved by this film.

We open as though this is a real concert feature- just a title card and curtain before revealing the orchestra warming up. No credits at all in the film- an only in the Disney canon. After an intro by Deems Taylor (more on him later), we delve into the first song, The Toccata and Fuge by Bach, a piece we are told that is music for its own sake. It's a bold and overpowering piece, one that is well suited to start the program, not only for its familiarity, but to get the blood pumping. The transition from performers to more and more abstract imagery helps settle us into the mindset of the film. I do want to give kudos to Disney for making references to what was going on in the fine arts world- perhaps it is not all that cutting edge- there was a much more strikingly abstract version plotted out by Oscar Fischinger, but you know Disney- he has a certain way of seeing things- and this version is not without his charms.

The Nutcracker Suite is probably the most visually impressive of the pieces, and is coupled with the most famous ballet by Tchaikovsky. Anyone who has seen the ballet may be expecting lots of snow and candies, but this is in fact a tribute to nature and the changing of the seasons. There is such a variety of techniques, from drybrush wings to airbrushed goldfish fins tracked over multiple times to give iridescence to handpainted snowflakes spinning in front of the camera (incidentally, if you ever have been curious about how they did all the phenomenally amazing tricks in this movie, many of which were lost for decades, you must see the Fantasia Legacy DVD). The mushrooms are adorable, the Russian Flowers make you want to dance, the fish are so seductive, and the snow scene is so full of joy and exuberance it brings tears to my eyes.

With an adaption of Paul Dukas' symphonic poem The Sorcerer's apprentice, itself based on the poem by Goethe, we come to the heart of the film. And I gotta say, I don't really care for it all that much. Although the whole project was birthed from this core, it feels out of place- maybe it's the recognisability of Mickey in his cartooney glory when the rest of the film has a decidedly more artsy animation feel. Plus it was way harsh having someone as sweet as Mickey clashingly kill the broom as the world turned a deathly gray. But for all my childhood trauma, I can still appreciate it for the resurgence of popularity of the updated Mickey and admit I probably would have liked it a lot better had it been a spectacular standalone, but then we wouldn't be having this discussion....

Igor Stravinsky's Rite of Spring famously caused rioting and general dissatisfation upon its premier ballet. And to be fair, if I was a part of crusty upperclass society, I'd be pretty ticked if I got tricked into thinking the ballet I was getting ready to sleep through turned out to be so noisy and chaotic, both in musical and visual forms. Stravinsky is not for every pallette, I do not particularly care for this piece myself and much prefer the vastly more melodic Fantasia 2000 choice of The Firebird. That being said, the best tactical decision made in this film was to pair the primitive sounds with exciting primitive life- dinosaurs. It's not terribly concerned with keeping true to facts, but the dinos are exciting.
The sweeping scope of the intro, whirling through empty space before centering on the desolate beginnings of our planet. It's very grand in theory, and again you should really watch the legacy dvd to see the care that was put into the animation of things that had never been conceived before. However, it reaaaaally tends to drag and I often skip to the action. There, it picks up and I love the blaring "DUN DUN DUN"s! as the Rex triumphs over his prey. Though the highs are signifigant, there are a lot of things about this feature I am not a fan of.

Against popular opinion, the Pastoral Symphony by Beethoven is one of my favorites. It would be best not to get me started on how amazing Beethoven is, so let's leave it at: he's freaking awesome. And I really love classical mythology, so I can't complain about the setting either. It's not really meant to be some kind of narrative as much as a vignette, a large moving painting that changes moods according to the music. Here's what I would say is the biggest and free-est exploration of color in the film- with rainbow landscapes and characters in every shade imaginible. Which unfortunately ties in with the big poo-poo that butchered the fun of this short. 1940s film still had a lot of racism in it, especially when things were being run by a lot of white men (which was basically everything mainstream). And it creeps up in no less than Fantasia, with a caricatured centaur known as Sunflower. After a few rereleases, tastes had definitely changed and since 1969 she has been erased, leaving gaps and jumps in the animation and music, some releases being more obvious than others. While I don't condone racism by any stretch of the imagination, I do think it does more harm than good to take the image out. Not only does it smack of an obvious cover-up and kill the quality in places, but it's untrue to the period this film was made. Yeah, the actions of the animators weren't right, but they represented what was going on in the day. Trying to erase that is like saying slavery never happened or that good people couldn't still have some misguided beliefs. It happened and that is an integral part of our history: one we should remember and learn from rather than completely ignore. I would much rather see something fully fleshed out and flawed than a piecemeal catering to the sensitivity of contemporary culture.

Ponchielli's Dance of the Hours may be forever connected with the Hello Mudda song in my mind (oh you know you were thinking it too). And just like the song, it's quite clever and funny. The juxtaposition of very awkward animals dancing ballet only gets more and more exaggerated as the sequence continues, and its pretty inspired. The hippos are the best work, with their fleshy bodies ambling and jiggling about, but I really love the crocodile. He is seductive, but at the same time you know just under the surface he is dying to devour his dance partner- what an odd charmer. In the midst of considerably more pretentious peices, it's nice to have a moment of Tex Avery-style anarchy to perk you up again.

Night on Bald Mountain and Ave Maria- Deliciously dark and radiantly pure, the juxtaposition of these two pieces could not have been more perfect. Bald Mountain is a massive, seething display of power. I'd say here the animation is the most complete realization of the music in the film- it's really overwhelming and terrifying, culmination in Chernabog as the embodiment of our worst nightmares. I feel a little battered by the climax, but it's the perfect setup. At the height of his theme, a single sound and glimmer of light shatters the chaos. The moment is quite beautiful as the lone voice in the terror, so low it is barely heard, breaks the spell and dispels the darkness of evil. Slowly, the voice grows and is accompanied by many lights and voices until it breaks out into the full theme of Ave Maria and we come from the cave into a brilliant, hopeful dawn. If there was no other reason for the multiplane camera, a device used to create depth but notorious for it's difficulty, it was justified by that massive tracking shot. Quite an inspiring ending to any film.

Quick word on the interstitials, which I greatly prefer as serious bits of information versus insipid comic interludes. I actually have never seen the restored version, which had to sacrifice Deems Taylor's voice to restore the originally scripted dialogue, but I am gonna go out on a limb and say its an improvement on the drastically edited version I grew up with. As for Deems Taylor- sadly, his casting is lost on us. The 40s would have been really familiar with him as a radio host among other things and he was the perfect sort of person to introduce to the public something as difficult to digest as "fine art" animation and classical music. He was both familiar and cultured, which I am sure means snobby, but I'd liken him to Ebert- a person of fine taste that most people can recognize and respect his opinion. And then there's the soundtrack- I'm not entirely sure I grasp the point of it, something to do with a stylization of sound waves, but neither do I find it annoying. It's amusing, if a little pandering, and does the job of cleansing the palette, as do all the intermediary stints.

After alllllll that, I am completely worn out! I've gotta get a handle on the length of these reviews before they become recaps. Soooooo, overall concensus: Fantasia was yet another massive push of innovation for Disney. Not only did it explore the relationship of commercial animation and fine art, but it resulted in so many advancements in special effects technology- I will never get over how many things were done with no computer aid whatsoever. And I would say a lot of people would agree with me when saying Fantasia was an amazing achievement, and totally watch-able film. So what was it that doomed Fantasia and killed it's extended roadshow in the cradle? Some say it was Disney's own drive to make whatever kind of film he wanted, despite the tastes of the public he was asking to fund his projects. While that kind of disregard can certainly make great art, it won't keep you in business long, as we will continually learn. The official company answer is the close of foreign distribution with the onset of WWII sealed Fantasia's fate. I think it was a little of both: with less resources, Disney was gonna have to swallow the hard pill that says you can't always draw what you want. But if you're lucky sometimes, a little elephant might just fly in and give you what everyone needs.


My Rating- 10/10 **********

Friday, October 22, 2010

Star-Struck: Howard Keel

Ladies man and leading man, if there is one person that is a perfect example of old-school Hollywood charm, it is the legendary Howard Keel.  From his dead-sexy voice to unmistakable swagger and unbridled charisma, he was the ultimate showman.  I cannot think of anyone who gave more magnetic performances, and despite his tendency to play the douche, he compelled leading ladies and audiences alike to love him more than they could be enraged.  I'll run reviews of the cream of his musicals, working my way up to what I think is the best:

4.  Kiss Me Kate
3.  Calamity Jane
2.  Showboat
1.  Seven Brides for Seven Brothers

The original guyliner- more please!

Wednesday, October 20, 2010

The Disney Derring-Do: Pinocchio

Flying Without Strings




Walt was hardly a person to rest on his laurels- as soon as he emerged triumphant from the Snow White gamble, the wheels were clicking for his next big risk. This would be even more ambitious, more spectacular, more beautiful. And Pinocchio certainly was- excepting only Sleeping Beauty and Fantasia, Pinocchio is the most artistically impressive film to come out of the Disney studios. And it was only number 2! Buuuut all the care and money poured into this film didn't pan out on the initial release. Ole Pinoch was the first of 2 box office bombs in 1940 for Disney.


For the majority of my childhood, I fell in with the crowd at Pinocchio's premier. The story, though not as bizarrely European in cruelty, darkness and an episodic nature as the source, is radically different from the most successful, and my favourite, of Disney films (namely those involving princesses). The title character is so terribly grating and naive, his innocence is more infantile than guileless. Fortunately, his wooden (can't resist) personality is overpowered by every other character in the film. Even the silent characters like Figaro and Gideon (save for one hiccup, courtesy of the great Mel Blanc) were forces of personality and pantomime. Though not the movie's namesake, I feel Jiminy Cricket is the true protagonist of the film. His lines are the first and last, and I am convinced the only reason we give a crap that Pinocchio doesn't end our misery as firewood is because Jiminy wills it otherwise. Despite the charisma of our hero, the film really belongs to the villains- a series of baddies who permeate every fiber of the movie. The weakest are the silliest: Honest John and Gideon, though slickly effective, cannot stain our memories with terror in the way Monstro and the Coachman do. Monstro, an unbridled force of mass and fury is unleashed on the screen in a scene of animated splendor. However, though not the adrenaline rush, the true terror of the film is the Coachman at Pleasure Island- a man who wants more than your life, he wants your humanity. It's more than your follies making a jackass out of you, it is you are going to die alone, unhuman and without your mommy! Harsh, and highly traumatizing for kids, heck, highly traumatizing for adults.


The only character complaint: here starts the tradition of talking animals that will mire the most illustrious of movies. As you will soon know all too well, my biggest peeve is the no-no line of believable interaction between humans and animals. Sure, a person can talk to animals, make believing the interaction indicates an understanding, but I hate hate hate animals holding conversations with people. Now, Pinocchio hedges against the rule very well, Pinocchio is obviously not a human, he is magical and only when he is in that state does he talk to other impossible objects, and no humans interact with talking objects besides Pinnoch. Though I cannot fault the film, I do bear it a slight grudge for opening the door for the tradition.


But back to a happier note: the songs. When You Wish Upon a Star- the Disney banner song- makes its debut here. Nowhere is it more poignant and beautiful that when sung here by Cliff Edwards. Give a Little Whistle is good too, and the rest kinda peters off from there, though none are offensive to the ear and I've Got No Strings is certainly catchy.


It's really impressive how much the animation improved since Snow White in only 3 years. Gepetto is convincing in a way the Prince could never have hoped to be. Figaro is wonderfully catty, and in Cleo I see the kind of work being done in Fantasia. Jiminy looks nothing like a cricket to me, but he is so much more relatable as a cute nondescript creature than an ugly cricket-thing. The pantomime started in Dopey is continued in Gideon, perhaps not as iconically, and Pinocchio himself makes up for all his flaws when he talks by moving so amazingly well. However, we all know the animation scene stealer is Monstro, the impossibly large, immeasurably fearsome whale. Moby Dick himself would turn tail from this concoction of mass and churning lines.


The backgrounds, done in oils as would become tradition, were wonderfully beautiful. Perhaps not as storybooky as the watercolors of Snow White, but so beautifully rendered, it seems more art than animation. A moment here to gush over the underwater sequences, where they took rippled glass and moved it in front of the camera to achieve the blurry effect. That is innovation and that is what makes Disney king.


So all in all, yeah Pinocchio has all the elements of a good film, even a borderline great film. But this one in particular seems so geared towards children, little boys in particular with the titular protagonist and his childish (not childlike- big difference) adventures, there is not as much fodder for adults to appreciate, unless they are into getting completely creeped out by evil donkey-magic, or the even more unlikely case they are as nuts about backgrounds as I am. I always find it entertaining and will bring it out when kids come around without protest, but as for myself, there are others that strike a more comforting chord.




Quote of the film:


-They never come back as BOYS!


My Rating: 
7/10 *******

The Disney Derring-Do: Snow White

More Than Your Ordinary Icon




First things first, a little background: Walt was the quintessential self-made man, having taught himself art and learning animation before striking out on his own. Even before the "folly" that became the standard, he had taken huge gambles on Mickey and the lesser known Oswald Rabbit. Drama was at the center of every venture he created, and if the results are any indication, he thrived on it. By the time the 30's came around, he had his sights set on the impossible: a full length feature showcasing a story he had obsessed over since his youth: Snow White. It was a risk and a flurry of unprecedented innovation, but what happened next... well that's history.

Even though Snow White and the Seven Dwarfs is touted as a spectacular achievement and such, it has kind of a bad rap when it comes to sitting down to actually watching it. For this review, I sat down and thought about all the times I've referenced SWSD or quoted what it represented, but could barely recall the last time I had seen it, or even wanted to. Unlike Walt's vision of animation as an art, a means of elevating your experience, animation has over time been downgraded to the slums of "kiddie" entertainment- forsaking simplicity for stupidity and universal chords for easy laughs. Do we feel deep inside that SWSD deserves this reassignment to lame cinematic scraps we feed to children, because everyone knows kids will watch anything? No. But do we buy into the mentality like it's going out of style- oh baby yeah! And that really is a shame.

As a piece of history, of course this movie is unparalleled. Everyone knows all the achievements and advancements that came from it. I will give my undying gratitude to Snow White for starting the undisputed greatest tradition in film history.  And honestly, for turning 70 this year, the old dame's held up pretty well. No, it has never been my favourite Disney fairy tale, but it has far more merits than detriments.

OK, OK the titular character is about as flat as the paper she's drawn on , gratingly dense, and there's no accounting for taste when choosing the voice (It feels like they were honestly going for 12 years old, which just disturbs contemporary audiences). And the animators definitely showed their weakness when it came to the prince, HOWEVER, the rest is superb. The watercolor backgrounds are lush and vibrant in a way that few movies could hope to imitate. The wonderful animation, voice work and characterization of the dwarfs more than make up for anything in the forgettable 2 minutes the prince is on screen.
So much care and individual quirks are put into the dwarfs. I put my old VHS copy in not too long ago and was completely taken back by how funny some of their stuff is. I was not expecting it to retain that much entertainment value, nor be so rife with dramatic tension. The forest and anything involving the Queen are genuinely terrifying- the first of many outrageously amazing lady baddies to totally steal the show. Many scenes I could not endure when I was little without throwing back my head and howling. The whole story is well done- taking a page or so of root text and expanding it to a feature film without ever dragging.


**Editors Note**  Ack!  I realized I forgot to talk about the most maddening tradition in all of Disney!!  I did a lot of my grumbling in Pinocchio, but boo on me, it actually started here and I am a doofus.  So here we have a princess.  And since princesses are these amazing magical creatures, they must have amazing magical talents.  Forget the pea, everyone knows a princess on the spot by her instinctual ability to commune with the fuzzywuzzy animal kingdom.  They may not always do something as deadly to your suspension of disbelief as talk, but they sure as heck are operating on a deeper level than reality indicates.  My platinum whatever copy of Sleeping Beauty actually tells me this is a requirement in one of the pop-up commentaries.  Anyways, say what you will, but talking animals bother me, so anything that contributes to their progression will irk me, and that is that.  *I had considered properly putting this at the end, but it seemed too cruel to end this review on that note*

The songs, by Frank Churchill and Larry Morey- who doesn't know them? Who hasn't learned to whistle to the tune Hi-Ho or danced with a broom to Whistle While You Work. Okay, somebody must have besides me. Adriana Caselotti's voice may not match our tastes today, but it's so instantly recognizable, it's synonymous with the film and I wouldn't change it if I had the choice.

So all in all, we all know SWSD is a historical piece of blah blah blah, but I think we've forgotten that beyond that, it really is a good movie. Like what they say about good wines, it only gets better with age.

Quote of the Film:


-I said, 'how do you do?'

-How do you do what?

My Rating:
9/10 *********

The Disney Derring-Do: A Preview

I love Disney with all that is in my being. Every fiber of me believes it is the place where dreams come true. No, I'm not talking about Disney World, I am in fact referring to the animation studios, a magical land that captures the imagination frame by frame. Yeah, I know the happy surface is but a thin veneer stretched over decades of ups, downs, takeovers, walk-outs, bankruptcy and drama, *DRAMA!*, but that only makes it all the more real and fascinating. And with the much-anticipated 50th feature coming fast down the pike, what better time than now to indulge in the history most fascinating that began with a man and his mouse? Actually, scratch that- we're gonna jump ahead to the moment Disney burst onto the big scene with something those in 1938 would have heard often: a man and his folly.


Oh, the folly!

There's No Business Like Show Business

Here I am, part nerd, part artist, a dash of drama, a pinch of cinematic snobbery and a huge helping of "cheese me, please!" I lay no claims to training in the film arts nor hold any pretensions to know how to critique movies any better than any other schmuck- I just love movies in the way that very few people should and am more than eager to put my opinion out there.


Let's go to the movies...